Saturday, 17 November 2012

Bankrupt Changes his name/ Ian Lazar/Ian Rogut

Mr Lazar in this article was formerly known as IAN Rogut a former diamond merchant  and bankrupt  . He is also the son of a former head of North Shore Synagogue, Rabbi David Rogut.

Did the Old rabbi have his hand in the synagogue collection pot also and this is where his son learnt it???
I am sick to death of Jews complaining how badly they have been treated  when   we only have to look to see what is occurring in the middle east.

.

Jacobsen settlement made before election

Date

    Colin Kruger

    The Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority confirmed yesterday it agreed to pay $1.5 million to settle a legal dispute with a company associated with veteran impresario Kevin Jacobsen that formerly operated the Sydney Entertainment Centre.
    But it denied rushing through the agreement just before the election that swept the Keneally government from office.
    Public records of a company associated with Mr Jacobsen indicate the authority reached an agreement with Arena Management just before the March 26 election.
    Arena was evicted as manager of the Sydney Entertainment Centre in August 2009 for allegedly breaching the lease, which it had held since the centre opened in 1983.
    Advertisement
    "A settlement agreement was reached on 21 April 2011 and signed by Arena Management and Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority, releasing the authority from all further claims," the authority said in a prepared statement yesterday.
    But the records of a March 28 creditors' meeting for another company associated with Mr Jacobsen, Campbell Street Theatre, show that the authority had already made an offer and it had been accepted by that date.
    The document reports that payment was due to be made the week following the election with more than $1 million of the settlement due to be paid to Campbell Street.
    When contacted by the Herald yesterday Mr Jacobsen said details of the settlement were confidential.
    He said the legal action was designed to claw back some of the $4.5 million Arena Management spent refurbishing the centre following a 10-year extension of the lease.
    Mr Jacobsen previously blamed the high rent, maintenance costs, and the refurbishment expenses for his decision to appoint a receiver to Arena Management just days before it was evicted as manager.
    Mr Jacobsen is caught up in a new battle to recover his share of the proceeds after a company associated with controversial businessman Ian Lazar appointed receivers to Campbell Street to recover money he is claiming as a secured creditor.
    Mr Jacobsen denies giving the security to Mr Lazar's company.
    Campbell Street's administrator John Sheahan said at the March meeting that if the claim was proven to be valid it was "very unlikely" that there would be any return for unsecured creditors.
    Mr Lazar, who was formerly known as Ian Rogut, is a former diamond merchant and bankrupt. He is also the son of the respected former head of the North Shore Synagogue, Rabbi David Rogut.
    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission wound up four companies associated with Mr Rogut in 2005 to "ensure that investors' rights and company assets are protected".

    Son of Rabbi David Rogut/ Bankrupt Changes his name

    The shonky person Ian Lazar   whom this article is about  has changed his name. He is a former Bankrupt and his name is Ian Rogut son of a Rabbi, David Rogut

    There is little doubt how shonkey some Jews are!

    Case of kidnapped canines descends into a dogfight

    Date

    Kate McClymont

    Ian Laza (did not want to be identified) with his dogs Amber the Sharpei and the two Chihuahua's Cloe and Simon,ian has recently had 4 other dogs stolen and held for ransom.Photography smh,2nd august,2011
    Holding on ... Ian Lazar (who did not wish to be identified) with the three dogs he owns that were not kidnapped. Thieves are demanding a ransom of $300,000. Photo: Brendan Esposito
    POLICE have searched several houses looking for the four kidnapped dogs of businessman Ian Lazar. The four small dogs were taken from Mr Lazar's north shore home two weeks ago. The dognappers have issued a demand of $300,000 for the safe return of Mr Lazar's pets Lilly, Bella, Goldberg and Max.
    Mr Lazar, 39, has given the police the name of the man, a former close associate, whom he believes to be responsible for the kidnap of his dogs.
    However, when contacted by the Herald yesterday, the man said he was not involved with the dogs' disappearance.
    ''I know nothing about the dogs,'' he said. He claimed the allegation against him was a ''set-up'' by Mr Lazar. He and Mr Lazar have fallen out over a substantial sum of money, the man said yesterday.
    Advertisement
    The man claimed he was one of many victims of Mr Lazar and that the pair had been close until about two months ago when Mr Lazar failed to honour a written agreement whereby Mr Lazar would repay a large amount of money. Mr Lazar, however, claims the signature on the documents is a forgery.
    The former associate of Mr Lazar's confirmed that the police had searched a home last week but had found no trace of any of Mr Lazar's dogs.
    Earlier this week Mr Lazar obtained an interim apprehended violence order against the man claiming he feared for his life. In his application Mr Lazar stated that the man had previously ''threatened to kill me and my dogs.'' Mr Lazar also claimed the man had ''bashed me in front of other people'' and forced him to pay over a substantial sum of money against his will.
    ''He has to come to my home and threatened me on more than one occasion and told me I would be the next Michael McGurk,'' Mr Lazar claimed in an interim AVO application.
    Mr Lazar's fiancee was previously married to one of the men allegedly threatened by the late standover man Michael McGurk.
    The former associate denied previously assaulting Mr Lazar.
    Mr Lazar, who has seven dogs, describes them as his ''babies.''
    Mr Lazar said the kidnappers had wanted him to buy his dogs back ''or their throats will be cut one by one,'' he said.
    Mr Lazar, who deals in the area of financial distress, works in an area rife with upset people. When people default on their loans, Mr Lazar said he negotiates a settlement with the bank and takes over the mortgage himself.
    Mr Lazar said in an email yesterday he had been ''assaulted on various occasions and demands for money were forcibly collected from property settlements''.
    He also said that it was ''easier to pay these monies over than have to have to deal with the continual expanded threat to my business, staff and friends. My mistake was letting it get to the level that it got to without taking a stance with the authorities''.


    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/executive-style/case-of-kidnapped-canines-descends-into-a-dogfight-20110803-1ibnl.html#ixzz2CTD9tnFR

    Friday, 16 November 2012

    Letter to Adam Toma Re Rental of Penthouse

    Letter to Adam Toma


    Mr Adam Toma
    C/ Port Douglas



    Dear Mr Toma,
    I refer to my email making enquiries on the availability of your 2 penthouses in Port Douglas to which I have received no reply.
    I urgently am in need of the verification if the penthouses are available the week 14th-21st January 2013.
    I believe it would be most satisfactory  if I were able to book both penthouses. Alternatively if both were not available I would like the larger of the two.
    This is the week that the Churches from all over Australia will be holding a bible study conference.
    As a church group we intend to have 47 Adults and 25 children staying in your penthouse. As I said we would prefer to have both penthouses, alternatively if only one was available we would be able to sleep all the adults in one bedroom and the children in the other.
    Naturally if it was necessary to sleep all the adults in one bedroom we would hire bunk beds so if you could recommend a local hire company to supply these I would appreciate it.
    Also on the 18th January 2013 we will also be having 27 Asylum Seekers from Manus Island and Naru staying with us for 2 days. We believe we can accommodate these people in hammocks on the balcony of the penthouse, so we we also like to hire 27 hammocks.
    As you only have 3 toilets available I have also taken this into consideration and we intend to hire 10 “ Port-a -loos” and I understand they can be positioned at the front of the property. I also intend to hire a large tent and erect it in the back yard and this could contain any stoves and fridges that we would need to obviously feed this amount of people as on the 19th January it is intended to have the asylum seekers baptized in your pool.
    Looking forward to your response.


    Yours sincerely
    XXXX




    Sunday, 11 November 2012

    Commissioner Steve Segwick APSC s41(f)

    This is a copy of the email sent to me form the Faggot Commissioner Steve Sedgwick Australian Public Service Commission.
    Despite extensive evidence of systemic corrupt conduct at ITSA whose head is Veronique Ingram and the failure of Alision Larkins, the fat mong who comes from Tasmania for failing in her obligation to expose the atrocious breaches of the Bankruptcy Act Steve Sedgwick made a decision that an inquiry into these two fat women was not necessary.


    I also would like to comment on Mr Steve Sedgwick's comment on the last paragraph of his letter where he said “Please stop sending abusive emails and posting abusive remarks about individuals. Any further abusive correspondence will be filed without reading”...........
    So fuckers stop reading them





    Wednesday, 15 August 2012

    OAIC FOI Insolvency Trustee Service Austalia

    From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
    To: enquiries@oaic.gov.au
    Subject: RE: Freedom of Information
    Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:56:34 +1000




    To whom it may concern,
    I have attempted to obtain a copy of the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia's investigation policy under FOI  This is a requirement that must be met by Agencies under the Financial Management and Accountability Act. I have as yet  received no reply or  .acknowledgement from them although I have contacted them by email on 2 occasions them.
    Following is a copy of the emails sent to them.
    Thank you
    Fiona Brown

    From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
    To: foi@itsa.gov.au
    Subject: RE: Freedom of Information
    Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 14:19:52 +1000

    To whom it may concern,
    I refer  to the following email sent to you on the 22nd July requesting a copy of  The Insolvency Trustee Service Australia's Investigation policy. This is a  requirement under the Financial Management and Accountability Act
    Please would you supply me a copy under FOI.
    Thank you
    Fiona Brown


    From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
    To: foi@itsa.gov.au
    Subject: Freedom of Information
    Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:13:18 +1000

    To whom it may concern,
    Under Freedom of Information I am requesting a copy of the your agency's investigation policy. This is a requirement under the Financial Management and Accountability Act.
    I will remind you what this contains:
    S1.1 Investigation Policy

    ::A statement regarding the agency's objectives in carrying out its investigation functions and use of sanctions.

    :: A clear definition of activities applicable to the Agency to which the AGIS apply. This should include a description of compliance activities that are not generally considered investigations by the agency.

    ::A statement regarding the agency's responsibility to manage matters that are considered minor or routine and

    :: A statement regarding the agency responsibility to refer criminal matters to the Australian Federal Police. This should include considerations of joint agency investigation teams where appropriate.

    Also under FOI I would like to be given in writing what level of Investigation training or qualification that Mark Findlay Bankruptcy Regulations received. Also I am requiring the same of Adam Toma National Manager Bankruptcy Regulations and Enforcement.
    I am also particularly interested if your investigations policy require all applicable Acts be complied with.
    Thank you
    Fiona Brown

    OAIC FOI Commonwealth Ombudsman

    From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
    To: enquiries@oaic.gov.au
    Subject: RE: Freedom of Information
    Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:59:36 +1000


    To whom it may concern,
    I have attempted to obtain a copy of the  Commonwealth Ombudsmans investigation policy under FOI  This is a requirement that must be met by Agencies under the Financial Management and Accountability Act. I have as yet  received no reply or  acknowledgement from them although I have contacted them by email on 2 occasions .
    Following is a copy of the emails sent to them.
    Thank you
    Fiona Brown



    From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
    To: ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au
    Subject: RE: Freedom of Information
    Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 14:23:56 +1000

    To whom it may concern,
    On the 22nd July I requested a copy of the Commonwealth Ombudsmans Investigation Policy under FOI. This is a requirement under the Financial and accountability Act. As  yet I have received no response.
    Thank you
    Fiona Brown


    From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
    To: ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au
    Subject: Freedom of Information
    Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:09:47 +1000

    To whom it may concern,
    Under Freedom of Information I am requesting a copy of the your agency's investigation policy. This is a requirement under the Financial Management and Accountability Act.
    I will remind you what this contains:
    S1.1 Investigation Policy

    ::A statement regarding the agency's objectives in carrying out its investigation functions and use of sanctions.

    :: a clear definition of activities applicable to the Agency to which the AGIS apply. This should include a description of compliance activities that are not generally considered investigations by the agency.

    ::A statement regarding the agency's responsibility to manage matters that are considered minor or routine and

    :: A statement regarding the agency responsibility to refer criminal matters to the Australian Federal Police. This should include considerations of joint agency investigation teams where appropriate.
    Also under FOI I would like to be given in writing what level of Investigation training or qualification that Kent Pervis has received. Also I am requiring the same of Margaret Chinnery Diane Merryfull and Alison Larkins
    I am also particularly interested if your investigations policy require all applicable Acts be complied with.
    Thank you
    Fiona Brown


    Email 2 Australian Federal Police Commissioner



    From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
    To: commissioner@afp.gov.au
    Subject: RE: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP
    Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:09:19 +1000

    Re AGIS

    .Dear Commissioner Negus,
     I refer to the following email to which I have received no reply.
    I will ask you again and make it clear to you what I am seeking.
     What safeguards have the Australian Federal Police  put in place that Australian Government Agencies comply with  Australian Government Investigation standards?
    Again this is another example of the incompetence of the Australian Federal Police who posses no obvious  powers in Australia.
    Please could you advise me  how the Federal Police also  intend to  monitor this taking into consideration clear lack of foresight?
    As with my previous email I remind you that should this matter go to court you will be subpoenaed to justify why the Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Australian Public Service Commission are able to protect  systemic corrupt conduct in Government Agencies using the investigation methods that you have revised.  
    Thank you
    Fiona Brown 

    From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
    To: commissioner@afp.gov.au
    Subject: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP
    Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:43:42 +1000



    .Dear Mr Negus,
    I understand  the Australian Federal Police has been involved  in a programme which has revised the  IGIS, or Australian Government Investigation standards.
     You will be aware this is a requirement under the Financial and Accountability Act.
    I am also aware all Government Agencies involved in this must complete training programmes.
    However, Internal noncompliance with legislation in Government Agencies have allowed systemic corrupt conduct to flourish.
    This is particular in the Insolvency Trustee Service, Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Australian Public Service Commission.
    It is clear now that although investigation standards do exist there is no safeguard that agencies comply with them.
    I am  now refer to section 4.8
    Agencies are to refer any matters to the AFP for possible investigation where there is substantial evidence of criminal activity or suspected criminal activity by a member of an Agency fraud investigation , control prevention or compliance unit. The AFP will also consider investigating matters where there could  be a real or perceived conflict of interest if the matter were to be investigated by the Agency concerned(for instance , where the allegations concerns a member of the executive with some responsibility for the Agency's investigation function)
     The Insolvency trustee Service Australia is aware it's Principal Legal Officer Matthew Osborne is giving Legal Advice to Trustee that the Bankruptcy Act may be breached using S134(3). This gives discretion to  a trustee, however it is limited only to property realized.
    According to Matthew Osborne this section gives a trustee discretion on all aspects of the Bankruptcy Act. It even extends to discretion as to misleading creditors.
    Please would the Australian Federal Police  advise me what powers have been put in place by them when they are made aware of the serious breaches by a number of Government agencies of the AGIS to cover up atrocious misconduct.
    If this matter should go to court  be aware I will  subpoena you  to give evidence  on your negligence .
    Thank You
    Fiona Brown